Adding someone to the panel who knows the book and the 1963 movie would have added so much depth to the discussion. There are so many Easter eggs to the book and the first movie (let’s all just agree to forget about the remake). No-one on the panel mentioned the cameo-actor from the first movie, and no-one could connect the book characters to their Netflix counterparts. Yes, the series is good on its own. But if you’re going to do a podcast about something with such rich source material, it’s probably a good idea to have some who can discuss the deep backstory.

Beware. The labeling of episodes was a pointless act. This is not truly episodic. If you have not read the book or seen the entire series, don’t come anywhere close to this spoiler-fest.

How can you do a whole podcast about a show based on a book and not read the book? It’s not even that long and it makes the show so much richer having read it.

I like the hosts we have, but I wish we could have a more masculine type of voice too. There seems to be a lot of the same perspective so maybe adding another guy could spice it up.

Hosts should do some (a lot) of research concerning the book.

I thought this podcast was only about episode 1, but I heard several references to future episodes such as the Red Room. Not everyone wants to binge a whole season at once so please warn the audience if spoilers or even hints about future episodes may be given.

Thought this was episode anchored with no future episode spoilers While Part 1 was well done there are too many references to episodes I have not seen yet So I am outa here